> > But libqt.so for qt3 should still be provided, not only libqt3-mt.so > > If you want developers to link their apps to against libqt-mt, just > > write documentation asking developers to do so, and file bugs if they > > don't. > > ???? That is exactly what we're doing right now !! The difference > between the last Qt packages and the current ones are that those stupid > bloatware static libraries are dropped and that you can be sure that > when you want to develop for libqt.so you only get exactly that, same > for qt-mt.
Hmm... Seems there was a bit of misunderstanding. I appologize.
