-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi,
I posted that one or two weeks ago , I have done woody debs of 3.1.5 : ftp://ftp-fourier.ujf-grenoble.fr/debian/kde-woody/ until Ralf provide its own, you can use these ones. Cheers, Mik Le Monday 09 February 2004 23:56, Nick Boyce a �crit : > On Monday 09 Feb 2004 10:16 am, Chris Cheney wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 09:00:55AM +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote: > > > On Monday 09 February 2004 02.22, Nick Boyce wrote: > > > > On Sunday 08 Feb 2004 11:49 pm, Andreas Goesele wrote: > > > > > Is 3.1.5 still to come or are we supposed to go directly to > > > > > 3.2? > > [...] > > > > > I'd be quite interested in that answer. > > [...] > > > > A quick 'apt-cache policy <some kde package>' shows that 3.1.5 > > > packages are in> unstable. > > > > They seem to be referring to the woody backport debs at kde.org. As > > to the answer I don't know what Ralf is planning... > > Yep, it's Woody debs we're after. In case anyone wants to suggest we > just go for 3.2 instead, _my_ stance on this is simply that 3.1.4 is > rock-solid on my machines, and only lacks the VCF security fix : > http://www.kde.org/info/security/advisory-20040114-1.txt > whereas people are currently reporting a number of more or less painful > issues with 3.2 on Woody (Kmail 1.6 bugs, packaging faults, cosmetic > issues, "could not start kdeinit", etc.). > > I'd like to join the collective shakedown effort (and play with all the > new geegaws), but just don't have the time right now - I must contain > myself and wait a while. > > If all this is now solved, could some kind person post a Woody-KDE > state-of-the-nation please ? > > Thanks > Nick Boyce > Bristol, UK -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAKBDxyOYzc4nQ8j0RAjRPAKCeOkV0KV5s39cpkPO6/KkNntkvxwCfeS2N Sg/DCFmyAnlpvBNHlw+uFMQ= =eNDa -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
