Hmm, Note I said 'from KDM's point of view', not from the system's point of view :p
David On Wednesday 10 March 2004 17:36, Jan De Luyck wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Wednesday 10 March 2004 18:34, David Pye wrote: > > It does work? > > > > Hmm, if so, then it matters little to me which one is used. > > > > If I might ask, what's the difference, from KDM's point of view, as the > > user isn't prompted for a password in either scenario, effectively making > > either one a passwordless login... > > There's a rather huge difference: the graphical shell is still unlocked > without a password, but people can't just use that account and login e.g. > via ssh without a password. > > Huuge difference. > > Jan > > - -- > A new chef from India was fired a week after starting the job. He > kept favoring curry. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFAT1IjUQQOfidJUwQRAld0AJ4udHp0mgfVkSfyMOIoFk3Re8BcdwCfdw4/ > iY7bNZXik8Cxlgzx6kH/oA0= > =W13i > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
