jedd writes: > Hi Dominique, Thanks for taking the time to reply to my rather > lengthy ramble.
No problem, thanks for rambling :) > > 2. kdm (and configuration files associated with same) still ] > > continue to assume everyone has 6 consoles and that X starts on ] > > vt7. Something for debconf perhaps. (F5's always seemed a far ] > > more sensible place.) > ] > ] /etc/kde3/kdm/Xservers is a config file, you can edit it. > Oh, sure, and the deb package asks if I want to keep it or not, but > it's probably more a wishlist thing for the Debian package to > separate out user-configurable stuff (vt for X, kdm wallpaper etc). Basically, everything in there is configurable, I'd guess. Doing it via debconf is a no-no anyway, because debconf is not intended for stuff that can have a reasonable default. > ] Don't upgrade kde while you have a kde session open. > Of course! But when I came back into KDE (after the upgrade was > done) there were a few konq's I had left on my desktop that loaded > up again and showed the html source. Reload gave the same results, > which was pretty weird, given that copying the uri's into new konq > instances gave the right results. Oh, I see. I haven't seen this happen, but it's very possible that something goes wrong wiht loading a session that was saved by an older konqueror version. > <taskbar changed from two rows to three> ] Is this a problem ? > AFAIK, it decides how many apps to show in there ] based on the > size of the panel you set. > It is a problem because it's an unexpected change -- I didn't > change the size of my panel -- it's the same size it was before the > upgrade. And therefore a default's been changed by someone who > liked this look better. But that's a generic take on the problem. > Specifically yes, it's ugly, it's hard to peck and find the > application I want to find now, and it looks really cluttered. A > bug already exists on this one (77407). ack > ] I don't know about this. Again, if you think this is a bug, you > can ] file a bug report about this at bugs.kde.org. > I'm still getting the hang of kontact and searching the net about > this one -- the way that kontact embeds the 'ToDo List' is a little > odd (much is replicated from Calendar). I've filed a few things > this evening that are definitely bugs, and am holding off on other > things until I work out whether they really are (or whether I'm > really dumb :). And yes, I'm usually pretty careful about whether > I file them at bugs.kde or bugs.debian. > I'll have more accurate insights once I upgrade the next couple of > machines. ;) Great, work like this is very helpful, thanks. cheers domi
