On Tuesday 30 March 2004 00:26, jedd wrote: > Keep in mind that I do agree, btw. I think kdm should, in the absence of > any specified user preference, launch you into kde. And I don't think an > upgrade should remove any user-level preferences about wm's.
I had actually selected KDE session once using the old 3.1 version, because I wanted to see what would happen. It automatically selected kde from then on, but after upgrading, that setting was forgotten. > ] Isn't it a better idea to just give people a working session, and let > the ] people who need something else select it instead. Surely you are not > loosing ] a lot by having a few people log in to find that they don't like > the session ] they get, then log out again, select the correct one and go > on from there. > > Hehe .. you do realise that that's exactly what happened to you, right? Now you are playing devils advocate. It's not exactly the same. If you got a KDE session you wouldn't be liable to think that something was wrong. Getting just a blue screen with a window that has no decorations at all (are you sure that's twm, there was no window borders!), caused me to think my system was seriously broken. > I'm starting to feel all nostalgic about the days when just getting that > clunky ol' twm thing coming up was cause for much excitement. Oh my.. Why did I sell my ZX81?? Sigh.. Anders -- This email was generated using KMail from KDE 3.2.1 on Debian GNU/Linux
