On Monday 04 April 2005 18:20, Derek Broughton wrote: > On Monday 04 April 2005 12:35, Dennie Bastiaan wrote: > > On Monday 04 April 2005 15:40, Bastian Venthur wrote: > > > Hi List, > > > > > > Sorry for beeing so annoying, > > > > You're not. The fact that debian won't include x.org and (therefor?) > > won't include KDE 3.4 is _very_ annoying. I know that a lot of people > > explained why it is like that, but I see many debian-users around me who > > find it very annoying also. And I cannot see why it is so hard to include > > x.org before sarge goes stable. It isn't called "unstable" for no reason. > > I'm not alone. You're not alone. > > Well Sarge _isn't_, and has never been, unstable.
I think you misunderstood me there. I actually meant including x.org in unstable, before sarge goes stable. I know that sarge isn't unstable (actually sid is), since I've been a debian user for three years now. :) > Don't you consider it pretty rude to say something inflammatory, and then > insist you've got no time for the debate? I just told how I felt. I didn't inflame anything. I'm sure debian already knew that most users don't like the slow release-cycle. It has been debated over and over again. That's why I don't want to make time for it. If you find it rude, then I'm sorry, but I'm just being honest. :) -Dennie -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
