El Jueves, 16 de Marzo de 2006 22:49, Steven Ihde escribió: > Using KMail's disconnected IMAP seems like it should work. There's just > one problem -- checking for new mail is so slow it's unusable. It takes > more than five minutes to do one check for mail -- every time. It spends > most of the time in the "uploading status of messages" phase. I have about > 16000 messages in the folder -- should I expect dimap to perform well in > this situation? Using KMail's regular imap, a check for new mail on the > same folder is virtually instantaneous.
KMail stores some special status of messages in its binary indexes: http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-pim&m=112707919726650&w=2 I suppose that KMail does some kind of trick to store this special status in the server. Maybe this is causing the slowdown. > I also tried using the script "offlineimap" to maintain a cache on the > laptop disk. But the problem here is that KMail doesn't propagate the "To > Do" flag (or any other flags except the basic read/unread status AFAICT) to > the server, so the cached copy doesn't get the flag status. :-( Is there > a way to force KMail to store the flags on the server instead of in its > cached copy of the headers? Its very likely that the offlineimap program doesn't understand kmail's indexes, so it simply ignores them, and the changes are not propagated to the server. -- Alex (a.k.a. suy) - GPG ID 0x0B8B0BC2 http://barnacity.net/ - Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
