On Jan 15, 2008 3:18 AM, Alejandro Exojo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > El Martes, 15 de Enero de 2008, Paul Johnson escribió: > > I > > think the upstream KDE team was quite premature in calling it stable > > given some relatively basic stuff like configuring the panel are still > > missing. > > Stable doesn't mean "with all the features KDE 3 had". :-) > > Sure, I also think that the panel has _way_ less features that I'm very used > to in kicker, and I probably am not going to use the KDE 4.0 desktop, but I > disagree with what you said. > > KWin, Dolphin, JuK, Konsole, Okular, Gwenview, and lots, lots of applications > (especially from KDE Games and KDE Edu), are ready, stable, and have hot new > features.
My first impressions of the new Konsole are fairly negative. Are they trying to take a page from gnome-terminal's book with keybindings that are common in terminal programs. "Hey, let's make the default keybinding for some obscure function we threw in because we got a single wishlist bug with a code snippet ALT+CTRL+L. Nobody uses that for a frame refresh key or anything important ever!" And what's with not being able to automatically resize the konsole back to your choice of standard terminal dimensions? It's a remarkable step backwards. > Delaying more the release just because Plasma is not fully on par with > kdesktop and kicker, would be unfair to the rest of the projects inside of > KDE. I disagree. If you're going to redo something as basic and taken for granted as kdesktop and kicker, it should at least do the basics like properly capture tray icons from things like wine and Google Desktop instead of displaying an empty space you can do nothing with where the icon should be. It's like if a contractor came to remodel, decided the floors were taking too long and said "We'll get around to finishing it in three weeks. In the meantime, just walk on the joists, you'll be fine. Just watch your step, it's 12 feet to the basement floor!" -- Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
