El Miércoles, 30 de Abril de 2008, Felix Homann escribió: > I didn't try this time. Last time, kdvi wouldn't go hand in hand with > KDE4. Since I'm TeXing almost everyday, KDE4 wasn't an option for me > then. Getting back to KDE3 (cleanly) was that easy either. So I was > reluctant to try it again without knowing how to use kdvi or a > inverse-search capable Okular. > > I'll give it a try again on the weekend. > > > On the other hand you can use pdflatex but for shure, you know that. So > > you might have reasons to use the dvi driver. > > Yes, I know. Reasons to use dvi are > > 1. I've got way too many .eps files. Why should I bother converting them > all to pdf? (I tend to produce pdf and eps graphics in parallel now for > a while) > 2. My Emacs is nicely set up for working together with kdvi. I don't > know how to achieve the same using Okular/pdfsync.
Excuse my ignorance, but what is the gain of using KDVI over a PDF viewer like Okular? I always create PDFs to test how my LaTeX is looking, and I do that only because most times (but not always) I print them. -- Alex (a.k.a. suy) - GPG ID 0x0B8B0BC2 http://barnacity.net/ - Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
