On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 01:26:34PM -0400, Curt Howland wrote: > On Thursday 06 May 2010 it was so written: > > On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 07:41:23AM -0400, Curt Howland wrote: > > > On Thursday 06 May 2010, Ana Guerrero was heard to say: > > > > On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 03:17:43AM -0300, Jorge Gonçalves wrote: > > > > > Maybe use dummy packages, or rename the packages so that KDE > > > > > 3.5 could remain installed, and not be forced to upgrade to > > > > > Kde4. > > > > > > > > No, there is not sane way and there is nobody interested on it. > > > > > > While the former is certainly true, the latter is demonstrably > > > false. > > > > False? > > Yes, false. There are lots of people who are interested in having KDE3 > continue, as opposed to being "forced to upgrade" to KDE4. >
Ok, you read me wrong: nobody is interested in working on it. > > Who from the current maintainers have seen you showing > > interest in maintaining KDE 3.5? Please demostrate it :-) > > I'll demonstrate, sure. > > "there is nobody interested on it" does not equal "there is no > developers interested in working on it". > > If you had stated "from the current maintainers" in the first place, I > would not have taken your statement as inclusive of all people, and > you would not have then assumed that I mean developers. > > That there are no interested developers to do the work involved is > self evident, since it is not occurring. And since we said from the very beginning (more than 2 years) it was not going to happen. You have demostrated nothing here =) Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
