On Monday 04 October 2010 06.39:03 Rustom Mody wrote: > On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 1:36 AM, George Kiagiadakis < > > On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Rustom Mody <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > So then there was a discussion about whether to use debhelper or cdbs > > > and I was suggested to ask here > > > > Adrian already answered to that, it's your choice. > > ?Who? I didn't cc you. Here's my email again. -- vbi -- BOFH excuse #385: Dyslexics retyping hosts file on servers
--- Begin Message ---Heyho! On Sunday 03 October 2010 13.54:16 Rustom Mody wrote: > My question was around the fact that debian generally prefers > autoconf; configure; make sequence but qt apps use qmake instead of > configure. Debian "prefers" more or less standard build systems to arcane handwritten ones, but OTOH replacing the build system of a package is actually done only in rare cases. That said, I guess qmake can be considered standard for Qt applications. > So then there was a discussion about whether to use debhelper or cdbs > and I was suggested to ask here That probably comes down to personal preference. Personally, I never could wrap my head around cdbs and found debhelper more obvious because there's less behind the scenes magic going on. OTOH I never really *tried* to understand cdbs so I can't really compare the two systems. cheers -- vbi -- Finagle's First Law: If an experiment works, something has gone wrong.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--- End Message ---
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
