Am Dienstag, 19. Juni 2012 schrieb Dietz Pröpper: > Martin Steigerwald: > > The switch to Akonadi for KMail is a big one. > > And a quite questionable, too.
Everything is questionable. But I believe that the fundamental decision to use a database for metadata is sound. > > And I think even right now > > there is no way of automatic migration thats working out okay in most > > cases. > > Wow. What do they smoke over at KDE Central? Not a very helpful comment in my oppinion. And nothing for me to follow up on. > > Thus the recommended procedure as far as I am aware of is to > > recreate mail accounts and reimport mail from IMAP server or POP3 > > mail directory. As far as I read its usually also necessary to > > recreate all filter rules. > > Fine. I have a ~/Mail around 1G in size and a forest of filter rules. > This "recommended procedure" is simply not feasible for me. > > Add to this the quite braindama^W questionable idea to move not only > metadata stuff but the complete maildir to akonadi, and *I* will be out > of the game, for sure. Even if repeated even more times it will not become true. Akonadi is a metadata cache. Not the mail store. So once again also here on this list: Please read Akonadi misconception #1: where is my data? http://blogs.kde.org/node/4503 Thanks, -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201206200952.49094.mar...@lichtvoll.de
