Am Mittwoch, 28. November 2012 schrieb Julian: > On 28/11/12 03:12, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > Am Montag, 26. November 2012 schrieb Kevin Krammer: > >> On Monday, 2012-11-26, David Smith wrote: > >>> On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:00 PM, chymian<[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> at the moment I'm tied to icedove/thunderbird which is another sad > >>>> story. > >>>> > >>>> tia > >>>> günter > >>> > >>> Yes, I agree the state of KMAIL in Wheezy is really bad.. It's > >>> *VERY* easy to make it crash 10-15 times an hour with normal > >>> operation of the program. I've also resorted to just removing it > >>> and running ice dove which is easily 1000x better in features and > >>> never crashes. > >> > >> Is this a different version than the one in Unstable? > >> Because the one in Unstable does not show that kind of behavior. > >> > >> Here it is one the few applications that run at all times (I start > >> it one of the first things when logging in and never quit it until > >> I log out) and this laptop often sees uptimes of 60 days and more. > >> > >> I do run it as a component within Kontact, but I would be surprised > >> if this is the important difference. > >> > >> The version reported here is 1.13.7 > > > > +1. > > > > KMail runs for days without being restarted here. POP3 accounts, more > > than one million mails. > > > > Only thing is that sometimes it is stuck on sending an outgoing mail. > > I found this to be related with nepomuk and I think I even mentioned > > it on kdepim oder kdepim-users in some thread. AFAIR I can unstuck > > it by stopping a certain nepomuk related process. > > > > I did not see this on my workstation at work I think and on the work > > user on this laptop. IMAP with both. > > The problems I experienced was: > 1) Kmail/akonadi in a X Terminal environment.
What do you refer to by X Terminal enviroment? I use KMail on laptop or dedicated workstation. But I don´t know how a Thin Client environment should be making much of a difference. > 2) Rather large #PUBLIC imap hierarchies That KMail at work was working with shared folders if thats what you meant. > This is running squeeze. Had no problems with lenny (kde3.5). > If the stability of wheezy > squeeze when it comes to KDE then > thats great. I still suggest to you to try it. Bugs can still be fixed, although some may not be fixed if they are just "little annoyances". > Still curious as to why kmail/kdepim are still stuck at 4.4.x. Please look up the archives. Some Debian Qt/KDE developers provided their reasoning for all of this. Unless they changed their mind I think there is no need to repeat the explaination. And I´d rather see them spend their limited time working on Wheezy and possibly KDEPIM 2 test packages than arguing about their decision on this list. -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
