Hey, > So we should think about getting that patch to debian. It would be nice if > you create a debian bugreport against akonadi-backend-sqlite. this one can interpet as serious/grave bug against this package, cause it makes the package more or less not working, so this one can make its way into jessie.
> What do you think about the database performance fixes in akonadi-server > that I mentioned? They really make a huge difference regarding MySQL load > on my machine. Well the question is if the proformance problems are would reflect in a RC bug in debian. Other than that it is hard to get the patches into jessie. > I tested them for quite some time. that is good. > > Maybe would make sense ot ask for a point release like 1.13.1 on kde-pim > mailing list? It would be easier for Debian Qt/KDE team to pick that point > release. jessie is in freeze - so no new version will end up in jessie. Every patch that is not a fix of a RC bug must be approved by the release team. And the smaller the patch is the easier it is for all to understand. So the plan to get this into jessie ( and I would like to see it :) * The kde-qt team must be okay with the patch and would like to see this patch included, too. * A package with the (minimal) patches included. * There must must a bug report about this issue * an unblock request to release team: https://release.debian.org/jessie/freeze_policy.html So if you have time to ask for ack from the team and help with gettings this done - go on! But maybe it is better to discuss these things in IRC #debian- kde-qt together with others. Keep in mind, that all have much to do, so don't be disappointed if i won't work at the end, but it's worth trying it. Regads, sandro PS: I'm not a DD nor part of KDE/QT team, so all my writing is not official statement to anything and are only my thoughts of this topic. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
