On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 08:20:13AM +0200, maks attems wrote: > > Then please reopen and add wontfix tags. Note, however, that #272063 and > > #272067 (specialy #272067) are unrelated to the first one and a refusal from > > the team to fix #272029 doesn't imply a refusal to fix the latter. I would > > appreciate an explicit message about them if that is the case. > > well i'm also member to the team and the policy is quite clear, > if you want to have a new feature added to the debian kernel, > you must get it included upstreams. > from that position the 3 requests are quite similar.
Uhm. Well I disagree but I don't feel like discussing about it. I'll focus on working with upstream instead, as you want. -- .''`. Proudly running Debian GNU/kFreeBSD unstable/unreleased (on UFS2+S) : :' : `. `' http://www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-gnu `-
