On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 01:44:43PM -0500, Adam Majer wrote: > > I'm just looking at arch. It seems to be better than CVS - I never liked > the version tracking since it was per file. :) > > Thanks for the suggestion - arch seems better than CVS. >
Mmm, what's better among subversion and arch? > > You see I want to know what patches are applied to the vanilla kernel to > make the vanilla kernel a Debian kernel. Furthermore, I also want to > know where these patches are from (ie. from whom) and for what purpose. > I agree, having a decent tracking of what patches are used on d-kernels and why, is a good point. -- Francesco P. Lovergine
