On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 04:40:23PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Wed, 2 Jun 2004 20:51:04 +0200, Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 02:33:53PM -0400, Clint Adams wrote: > >> > The alioth repository host is currently not suitable for large > > ^^^^^ > >> > repositories. > >> > >> It is for arch.debian.org. > > > arch is not suitable for large repositories either. > > Don't we already have an arch repository of the linux kernel, > every single released version from the beginning? And I would be > interestged in hearing how arch does not scale (seems to me it does > better than CVS, and I don't know svn enough to comment)
BTW, do you know if there is a arch->bitkeeper gateway ? If yes, this would be a strong recomendation for using it, but i somehow doubt it. That said, i prefer the simpler to use subversion, it let you be more productive. Friendly, Sven Luther
