Andrew Suffield writes: > On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 03:18:32PM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > >> They can believe what they want. But for legal relevance they have >> to show how exactly the firmware was derived from the rest of the >> code (or vice versa). If they can't, it is merely a collection of >> works. > > Don't be absurd. Any resulting binary is obviously derived from both.
Why is that obvious? I have a binary on my bookshelf that is a combination of works with conflicting licenses. Is it a work derived from all of them, or is it just an unofficial Debian CD install? Michael Poole
