Hi, Sven Luther writes:
> Huge ? Yes, huge. Twice the size of the other patches combined. Twenty times if you omit the asfs patch from the others. Talking about the asfs patch, any progress getting it accepted upstream? Any reason why it should not be promoted to kernel-source in the meantime? > It is a full gigabit ethernet driver, what did you expect ? In any case I did not expect to see a full gigabit ethernet driver appear in an arch specific patch. > Well, it should be powerpc & mips only, Then it definitely belongs in kernel-source until it is accepted upstream. > Well, ok, the idea behind it is to not upload a package by mistake > while it has not yet been blessed. As you wish. I don't really care. Either way, it's hard to upload something by mistake if it takes more than an hour to build. [...] > You are supposed o use dch -a anyway to add a new entry, which would set > also the last modification entry correctly and such. I will definitely continue using emacs for editing changelogs. > But maybe we should discuss this more broadely. [...] No we shouldn't. It's not worth it. Just add whatever changelog entries you like, but do mark them with your name (which you didn't). > BTW, where you able to boot kernels whose image was generated with > version 3.1-pre2-1 of module-init-tools (the one in unstable) > installed ? No, but I submitted a patch to the BTS that made it into 3.1-pre2-2. > It fails here because of missing /etc/modprobe.conf. That message is spurious, I also submitted a patch for that, but it's pending upload. Regards, Jens. -- J'qbpbe, le m'en fquz pe j'qbpbe! Le veux aimeb et mqubib panz je p�zqbpbe je djuz tqtaj!
