On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 04:10:32PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote: >> Sounds good. We should move to the 2.6.7 debs ASAP so this should keep >> the thing out of people's hands until it's removed from the archives.
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 08:46:04AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > Any news on the 2.6.7 debs ? It is again something like 2-3 weeks now > since they where uploaded, isn't it ? > Also, what is your opinion on going with 2.6 over 2.4 on certain arches > by default ? I noticed nobody seemed to care about my mail on the > subject. > Friendly, > Sven Luther It would be great to move to 2.6 in as many areas as possible. It's the new stable kernel, and 2.4 is in a deep freeze, so we would make the best use of maintenance effort that way. I think the only exceptions are architecture ports not supported and/or working in 2.6 but that need 2.4 or earlier to function. But this can only be a recommendation since I only have the i386 and alpha packages. -- wli
