On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 05:08:21PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting Christoph Hellwig ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > swusp isn't really stable enough yet. Maybe for sarge+1 > > I wasn't hoping this for sarge, don't be afraid..:-) > > So, sarge+1 is a good target, imho, provided this is added to kernel > compilation asap in order to get tested enough when we will release > sarge+1 in 6 months..:-))
you can call it by its name now, i suppose, since it seems it will be going to be etch. Now, 6 month seems a bit unprobably, but a year would be nice. Friendly, Sven Luther
