On Mon, 30 Aug 2004, Alexander Wagner wrote: > Ups sorry, seems that I missed it. As I don't have my hands > right now on the 2.6-box I could provide the same dump for a > 2.4-powered box. I believe in this case it is the same > information.
> T: Bus=01 Lev=01 Prnt=01 Port=01 Cnt=01 Dev#= 5 Spd=12 > MxCh= 0 > D: Ver= 1.10 Cls=00(>ifc ) Sub=00 Prot=00 MxPS=16 #Cfgs= 1 > P: Vendor=054c ProdID=0099 Rev= 1.00 > S: Manufacturer=Sony > S: Product=Sony PEG Mass Storage > C:* #Ifs= 1 Cfg#= 1 Atr=c0 MxPwr= 6mA > I: If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 3 Cls=08(stor.) Sub=05 Prot=00 > Driver=(none) > E: Ad=81(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS= 64 Ivl=1ms > E: Ad=02(O) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 64 Ivl=0ms > E: Ad=82(I) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 64 Ivl=0ms Good, that's what I wanted. > > (BTW, these devices might be a good reason for using that > > new delayed-scanning patch.) > > Sorry, I'm not that deep in the matter that I know what > you're talking about here. I could include that patch and > give it a try as well if you give me some pointer where to > get it. Sorry, that remark wasn't addressed to you but to one of the other people on this thread. > > Alternatively, someone who didn't want to fool around like > > that sent in an unusual_devs.h entry for a Clie model with > > the FIX_INQUIRY flag set, and that helped him. I could > > tell you what needs to be added, but first I have to see > > your /proc/bus/usb/devices file. > > If I can be of any help tell me what to do, but I should > say, that I'm no kernel hacker so I'd need some simple > instructions on that end. In other words: for me all this > sounds very professional but I don't really understand what > you're talking about. ;) What I got is that the Clie > connects to the USB and tells "no device". If you're not familiar with the process of patching a kernel, it's probably best if you simply upgrade. I believe that kernel versions from 2.6.8 on up will handle the Clie properly. Alan Stern
