On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 08:38:56AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > tags 272029 +upstream > thanks > > Please get feature-patches merged upstream before bugging us, thanks.
Upstream rejected them untill they're "a lot more commonly used", which can also be read as "supported in major distributions like Debian". Considering your opinion then the patches should go to /dev/null? Where are we going? FATX support is non-disruptive (Separate module from vfat. It won't even be loaded at all unless the user wants it). What are the problems with it? If your concern is with the release process, I can understand, and don't mind leaving this as post-sarge. -- .''`. Proudly running Debian GNU/kFreeBSD unstable/unreleased (on UFS2+S) : :' : `. `' http://www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-gnu `-
