reopen 272029 thanks On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 10:03:06PM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 12:31:37PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 06:25:23PM +0900, Horms wrote: > > > On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 09:21:12AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > > > > On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 08:38:56AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > > tags 272029 +upstream > > > > > thanks > > > > > > > > > > Please get feature-patches merged upstream before bugging us, thanks. > > > > > > > > Upstream rejected them untill they're "a lot more commonly used", which > > > > can > > > > also be read as "supported in major distributions like Debian". > > > > Considering > > > > your opinion then the patches should go to /dev/null? > > > > > > > > Where are we going? FATX support is non-disruptive (Separate module > > > > from > > > > vfat. It won't even be loaded at all unless the user wants it). What > > > > are > > > > the problems with it? If your concern is with the release process, I > > > > can > > > > understand, and don't mind leaving this as post-sarge. > > > > > > I would suggest making a kernel-patch package. > > > That seems to be the correct vehicle for new features to me. > > > > And getting the FATX patches merged into 2.6 would also be a good > > precursor to getting them merged into 2.4 or Debain's kernel package. > > I think that pretty much wraps this up, I am closing the bug.
It's not fixed. Add a wontfix and/or upstream tags if you like. -- .''`. Proudly running Debian GNU/kFreeBSD unstable/unreleased (on UFS2+S) : :' : `. `' http://www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-gnu `-
