Your message dated Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:08:14 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line use make-kpkg
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Feb 2002 21:30:36 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 04 15:30:36 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from d-137-193-64.bootp.virginia.edu (ariel.local.net)
[137.54.193.64]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16XqhA-0004L5-00; Mon, 04 Feb 2002 15:30:36 -0600
Received: from ariel (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ariel.local.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D03BBDF70
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 4 Feb 2002 16:30:35 -0500 (EST)
From: Brian Mays <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: kernel-image-2.4.17-i386: Please support a binary-modules target
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.42
X-Mailer: mh-e 6.0; nmh 1.0.4+dev; Emacs 20.7
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2002 16:30:35 -0500
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: kernel-image-2.4.17-i386
Version: 2.4.17-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Please add a binary-modules target to the debian/rules makefile. The
purpose of this target is to facilitate building one or more "add-on
modules" packages against the kernel-image packages produced by this
source.
An example implementation is included below. It assumes that the source
for the modules packages is located in a directory under the "modules"
directory (which might be a symbolic link to another directory). This
has the advantage of working well with the source packages for add-on
modules. That is, each of these "source" packages (e.g., pcmcia-source)
contains a tarball that unpacks into a "modules" subdirectory. With
this scheme, these tarballs can be unpacked at the top of the source
tree (perhaps automatically), and the "binary-modules" target works.
See the source of the kernel-image-2.2.20-reiserfs package for an
example of how this can be used to automate building add-on modules
packages to accompany a series of kernel-image packages.
---- example implementation -----
binary-modules: unpack-stamp
for i in $(flavours); do \
cd build-$$i; \
MODULE_LOC=`pwd`/../modules \
make-kpkg --append_to_version -$$i modules; \
cd ..; \
done
-mv *.deb *.changes ..
---------------------------------
I realize that the source for this package currently contains a
"modules" subdirectory at the top of its tree. I suggest, however, that
this subdirectory be renamed for the reasons cited above.
Thanks,
- Brian
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 132379-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Sep 2004 15:08:05 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 29 08:08:05 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from baikonur.stro.at [213.239.196.228]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CCg3p-0006SA-00; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 08:08:05 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by baikonur.stro.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BA985C069
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:08:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from baikonur.stro.at ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (baikonur [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 19517-09 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:08:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from sputnik (stallburg.stro.at [128.131.216.190])
by baikonur.stro.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADEE15C00A
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:08:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from max by sputnik with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1CCg3y-0000lF-7V
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:08:14 +0200
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:08:14 +0200
From: maks attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: use make-kpkg
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i
Sender: maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavis (ClamAV) at stro.at
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
your binary-modules looks flaky.
please use make-kpkg for building your costum kernels
or modules packages.
--
maks
kernel janitor http://janitor.kernelnewbies.org/
