-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Hi folks,
I have posted several patches for initrd-tools to this list and to the bug tracking system. And I am not alone: A lot of bugs for initrd-tools could be marked as fixed, if the patches that can be found in the various reports get applied.
2(!) of my patches have been applied for 0.1.75 (on experimental) by somebody with write permission on CVS, but not without introducing a stupid typo (breaking SCSI support completely) that was not in my patch. Of course I have created another bug report and attached the obvious fix, too.
For 0.1.76 (on unstable) I was surprised by the changelog claiming that I did introduce the typo. Come on, folks! I am used to test my software. Surely as every SW engineer I have introduced a lot of bugs to the software I was involved with. But I don't like to be accused in the changelog for delivering bad code, just because somebody preferred to manually apply my patch and then did not even verify his work.
But what really makes me pissed is that all the other patches floating around in the bug reports still haven't been applied! They haven't been rejected, either.
For my part this makes me feel that I have just wasted my time. Why should I send you any more patches, if they are ignored?
Regards
Harri
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFB1b4wUTlbRTxpHjcRAuiBAJ9zgsQxqJxxKTBPttQWX6rM8OKCRQCbBkCC meazYsuWQTMsF8U5FoOnTyM= =+qtX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
