Your message dated Thu, 6 Jan 2005 17:17:26 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#287367: kernel-image-2.6-386: The meta-package is not 
up-to-date
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2004 11:31:01 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 27 03:31:01 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 85-64-143-53.barak.net.il (fourbox.held.org.il) [85.64.143.53] 
(mail)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1Cit5X-0001Di-00; Mon, 27 Dec 2004 03:31:00 -0800
Received: from linbox ([192.168.0.1] helo=localhost)
        by fourbox.held.org.il with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 1Cit0U-0003LG-00; Mon, 27 Dec 2004 13:25:46 +0200
Received: from mar_garina by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 1Cit0v-0003DA-00; Mon, 27 Dec 2004 13:26:13 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Oren Held <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: kernel-image-2.6-386: The meta-package is not up-to-date
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.5
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 13:26:13 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Mar Garina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: kernel-image-2.6-386
Severity: normal

This meta-package purpose is to keep machines up to date with the
kernel version.

kernel-image-2.6-386 depends on an old kernel version (2.6.8-1), and
should depend on the newest existing package: kernel-image-2.6.9-1-386.

Same goes for kernel-image-2.6-* (686, k7, etc.)

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=he_IL (charmap=ISO-8859-8)

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 287367-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Jan 2005 08:45:13 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 06 00:45:13 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from koto.vergenet.net [210.128.90.7] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1CmTGb-0002PM-00; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 00:45:13 -0800
Received: by koto.vergenet.net (Postfix, from userid 7100)
        id A76393413A; Thu,  6 Jan 2005 17:26:58 +0900 (JST)
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 17:17:26 +0900
From: Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Oren Held <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#287367: kernel-image-2.6-386: The meta-package is not 
up-to-date
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Cluestick: seven
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 01:26:13PM +0200, Oren Held wrote:
> Package: kernel-image-2.6-386
> Severity: normal
> 
> This meta-package purpose is to keep machines up to date with the
> kernel version.
> 
> kernel-image-2.6-386 depends on an old kernel version (2.6.8-1), and
> should depend on the newest existing package: kernel-image-2.6.9-1-386.
> 
> Same goes for kernel-image-2.6-* (686, k7, etc.)

The wording is a bit weird, but this is supposed to depend on
the recommended package, which is 2.6.8, the target kernel for sarge,
and correspondingly the latest kernel in sarge.

-- 
Horms


Reply via email to