On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 22:42:48 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 10:18:04PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote: [...] >> The IRQ-after-swsusp-awakening patch (attached). Needed to make >> some hardware drivers work after resuming from swsusp (Source: >> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) >> >> The swsusp-speedup-patch (attached) - makes the swsusp in kernel a lot >> faster on suspending (source: >> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) > > We don't ship with swsusp enabled so this is just a waste of time.
I think enough people have been asking for swsusp that it may be worth trying to enable it again, and seeing how/if it breaks for people. I wouldn't want to do it for 2.6.10-1, though; rather, let's get 2.6.10-1 out there, and if that proves stable, we can start doing some more experimental stuff w/ 2.6.10-2. Ditto for the misrouted-irq patch.
