Your message dated Thu, 7 Apr 2005 16:36:52 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Solved in 2.6.11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Feb 2005 10:52:37 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 09 02:52:37 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from web42004.mail.yahoo.com [66.218.93.172] 
        by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1CypSX-0006oN-00; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 02:52:37 -0800
Received: (qmail 47703 invoked by uid 60001); 9 Feb 2005 10:52:06 -0000
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from [161.116.81.18] by web42004.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 09 Feb 
2005 11:52:06 CET
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 11:52:06 +0100 (CET)
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686: Unable to mount USB2.0 drives with default 
.config
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
        NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686
Version: 2.6.10-4
Severity: normal

Dear Debian & Kernel Developers,

Using kernel-image-2.6.10-i-686 from Debian, I am not
able to use my USB 2.0 Flash drive.

Upon plugging in the USB 2.0 Flash Drive, I am not
able to mount it, and dmesg shows errors:

usb 5-5: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and
address 3
usb 3-1: new full speed USB device using uhci_hcd and
address 2
usb 3-1: device descriptor read/64, error -71
usb 3-1: device descriptor read/64, error -71

As a workaround I can remove the module ehci-hcd

$ modprobe -r ehci-hcd
then the module uhci-hcd takes over, and the drive
works correctly.

I have checked, that compiling a new kernel, with the
following options disabled:

CONFIG_USB_EHCI_SPLIT_ISO=n
CONFIG_USB_EHCI_ROOT_HUB_TT=n

(the kernel-image-2.6.10 package from Debian has
CONFIG_USB_EHCI_SPLIT_ISO=y
CONFIG_USB_EHCI_ROOT_HUB_TT=y
)

the new compiled kernel has no problems seeing and
mounting the USB Flash drive.

Since the above options are marked "EXPERIMENTAL":
config USB_EHCI_SPLIT_ISO
        bool "Full speed ISO transactions
(EXPERIMENTAL)"
        depends on USB_EHCI_HCD && EXPERIMENTAL
        default n
        ---help---
          This code is new and hasn't been used with
many different
          EHCI or USB 2.0 transaction translator
implementations.
          It should work for ISO-OUT transfers, like
audio.

config USB_EHCI_ROOT_HUB_TT
        bool "Root Hub Transaction Translators
(EXPERIMENTAL)"
        depends on USB_EHCI_HCD && EXPERIMENTAL
        ---help---
          Some EHCI chips have vendor-specific
extensions to integrate
          transaction translators, so that no OHCI or
UHCI companion
          controller is needed.  It's safe to say "y"
even if your
          controller doesn't support this feature.

          This supports the EHCI implementation from
ARC International.

I would suggest to compile the Debian Kernel images
with the above options disabled.

Best regards, and thank you for your work.

Jaume

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (105, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-2-686-smp
Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(charmap=ISO-8859-15)


Versions of packages kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686 depends
on:
ii  coreutils [fileutils]         5.2.1-2    The GNU
core utilities
ii  initrd-tools                  0.1.77     tools to
create initrd image for p
ii  module-init-tools             3.2-pre1-2 tools for
managing Linux kernel mo



                
______________________________________________ 
Renovamos el Correo Yahoo!: ˇ250 MB GRATIS! 
Nuevos servicios, más seguridad 
http://correo.yahoo.es

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 294349-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Apr 2005 14:37:23 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 07 07:37:23 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from web42002.mail.yahoo.com [66.218.93.170] 
        by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DJY8J-0003U2-00; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 07:37:23 -0700
Received: (qmail 38316 invoked by uid 60001); 7 Apr 2005 14:36:52 -0000
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from [161.116.81.18] by web42002.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 07 Apr 
2005 16:36:52 CEST
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 16:36:52 +0200 (CEST)
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Solved in 2.6.11
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,NO_REAL_NAME 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Dear Debian and Kernel developers,

I installed the new kernel 

kernel-image-2.6.11-1-686

and the USB drive works correctly, hence I am closing
the bug.

Best regards, and thank you for your work,

Jaume



                
______________________________________________ 
Renovamos el Correo Yahoo!: ˇ250 MB GRATIS! 
Nuevos servicios, más seguridad 
http://correo.yahoo.es


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to