Christian T. Steigies wrote: [snip] > > Only for some m68k and sparc subarchitectures, and the m68k ones > > have still no newer 2.4 version available. (Status as shown by > > http://people.debian.org/~dannf/kernel-stats/kernel-avail.html) > > I beg your pardon? > > http://packages.qa.debian.org/k/kernel-image-2.4.27-m68k.html > > Maybe your script didn't like the change from half a dozen source packages > to just one for all of m68k.
I see, it seems to be outdated WRT. > Besides, bugs against the 2.4.25 and 26 images > have been filed by somebody called Frank Lichtenheld 188 days ago. > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=kernel-image-2.4.26-q40 Which is only a bug to block it from sarge, not a removal request against the ftp.d.o pseudopackage. Could you file those for obsoleted packages (or tell Frank if it is ok for him to do so)? Thiemo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
