On Sat, 2005-05-14 at 11:33 +0900, Horms wrote: > I am not planing to include the CAN-2005-0449 fix in the security or r1 > update as I undersdand that ABI changes are highly problematic. I am > willing to be convinced otherwise. >
Oh, do ABI changes in packages on security.debian.org break d-i as well? I figured it would continue pulling udebs from r0, giving us until r1 to spin d-i. Is there a problem I'm not seeing? -- dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
