On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 08:30:32PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 02:04:33PM -0400, Jurij Smakov wrote: > > As you might know, we are planning a transition to the common kernel > > source, which is expected to build all the kernel-related packages, > > eliminating the problems with arches getting out of sync, etc. > > Are the problems with > 200 binary packages really fixed? If you want to > "fix" the problems, you have to integrate the udeb build process which > produces currently something about 300 binary packages.
We have to investigate, but this can now be added as a release goal for etch, and fixed in time. I also was wondering if a bigger granularity of the module .udebs would be worthwhile, having one .udeb per actual module, and then this would be a worse problem. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
