On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 10:57 +0900, Horms wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 11:13:14AM -0600, dann frazier wrote: > > I'm happy to do it if you'd like. Though, I'd like to get a yea or nea > > on including the ABI change before spinning new ia64 packages. I'll > > plan to poke joeyh about it. > > Please do, as far as I am concerned it is his call. >
hey Joey, We're wondering if its safe to prepare kernel images for security.debian.org with an ABI change. We have at least one set of patches for a security vulnerability that will affect all 2.6 archs. Would that break d-i? Seems to me that it shouldn't, since the current ABI will still be in sarge, but you'd know best.. Doing so would of course make the new ABI packages candidates for 3.1r1, and would therefore require a d-i spin. Is that feasible? -- dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
