Goswin von Brederlow writes... > Matt Taggart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I really like the proposal other than that, but is there a way to keep a > > limited set of older stuff around longer? Sort of analogous to the "oldlibs > " > > idea. Maybe the package can split off older versions of itself, with more > > descriptive names, as it moves forward. Or something like that... > > snapshot.d.n?
You didn't read the part of my message where I said that snapshot.d.n wasn't acceptable. Of course this is just my opinion. Maybe if snapshot was an official debian.org service and publicly mirrored it might be ok? -- Matt Taggart [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
