On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 10:34 +0900, Horms wrote: > On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 01:18:20PM -0700, Debian Installer wrote: > > > > Rejected: kernel-image-2.6-k7-smp_2.6.12-2_i386.deb: old version (101) in > > unstable >= new version (2.6.12-2) targeted at unstable. > > Rejected: kernel-image-2.6-k7-smp_2.6.12-2_i386.deb: old version (101) in > > testing >= new version (2.6.12-2) targeted at unstable. > > Rejected: kernel-image-2.6-k7-smp_2.6.12-2_i386.deb: old version (101) in > > stable >= new version (2.6.12-2) targeted at unstable. > > Rejected: kernel-image-2.6-686-smp_2.6.12-2_i386.deb: old version (101) in > > unstable >= new version (2.6.12-2) targeted at unstable. > > Rejected: kernel-image-2.6-686-smp_2.6.12-2_i386.deb: old version (101) in > > testing >= new version (2.6.12-2) targeted at unstable. > > Rejected: kernel-image-2.6-686-smp_2.6.12-2_i386.deb: old version (101) in > > stable >= new version (2.6.12-2) targeted at unstable. > > Rejected: kernel-image-2.6-386_2.6.12-2_i386.deb: old version (101) in > > unstable >= new version (2.6.12-2) targeted at unstable. > > Rejected: kernel-image-2.6-386_2.6.12-2_i386.deb: old version (101) in > > testing >= new version (2.6.12-2) targeted at unstable. > > Rejected: kernel-image-2.6-386_2.6.12-2_i386.deb: old version (101) in > > stable >= new version (2.6.12-2) targeted at unstable. > > Rejected: kernel-image-2.6-k7_2.6.12-2_i386.deb: old version (101) in > > unstable >= new version (2.6.12-2) targeted at unstable. > > Rejected: kernel-image-2.6-k7_2.6.12-2_i386.deb: old version (101) in > > testing >= new version (2.6.12-2) targeted at unstable. > > Rejected: kernel-image-2.6-k7_2.6.12-2_i386.deb: old version (101) in > > stable >= new version (2.6.12-2) targeted at unstable. > > Rejected: kernel-image-2.6-686_2.6.12-2_i386.deb: old version (101) in > > unstable >= new version (2.6.12-2) targeted at unstable. > > Rejected: kernel-image-2.6-686_2.6.12-2_i386.deb: old version (101) in > > testing >= new version (2.6.12-2) targeted at unstable. > > Rejected: kernel-image-2.6-686_2.6.12-2_i386.deb: old version (101) in > > stable >= new version (2.6.12-2) targeted at unstable. > > I guess we need an epoch
Why not use linux-image-foo instead of kernel-image-foo, w/ an appropriate Replaces/Conflicts/Provides? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
