On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 04:03:31PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 04:25:19PM +0900, Horms wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 07:51:20AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 02:04:20PM +0900, Horms wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Referring to > > > > http://people.debian.org/~dannf/kernel-stats/kernel-avail.html > > > > (thanks dannf) I notice that the following kernel-tree versions > > > > are in use in Sarge: > > > > > > > > 2.4.27-10: alpha, i386, ia64, powerpc (latest) > > > > 2.4.27-9: powerpc > > > > 2.4.27-8: s390 > > > > 2.4.27-5: apus (so old its scary) > > > > > > apus is now built from the same package as powerpc, so there can be no > > > such > > > discrepancy in kernel-tree versions. > > > > A believe that is refering to the binaries produced by > > kernel-patch-2.4.27-apus, rather than the apus kernels > > produced by kernel-patch-powerpc-2.4.27. > > kernel-patch-2.4.27-apus should be kicked out of the archive, even from sarge > if possible, there is no reason it is still there, since the ones produced by > the -powerpc package obsolete it. I wonder why it didn't happen, either i > forgot to fill a bug against ftp.debian.org asking for its removal, or the > ftp-masters slept it over. It should have been removed in marsch/april or so.
Thanks. That means we can go right ahead and ignore them :) -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
