* Horms ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050811 23:46]: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 07:56:00AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > The latter, according to volatile policy (... must be autobuildable > > > from the same release...). > Is that part of the policy intended preclude providing an update to > kernel-package (or any other tool) that might be needed? It would > be good to clarify that. Technically, we consider sarge+sarge/security+sarge/volatile as the release we build volatile packages in. However, as build-depending on a newer version is _also_ a packaging change, there needs to be a really good reason for that (as for any packaging change). > Another solution I thought of would be to bundle kernel-package inside > linux-2.6 (for volatile/sarge) somewhere. Though I am not sure > how much surgery would be required to relocate kernel-package. Well, that's obviously worse. Cheers, Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
