On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 01:13:46AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote: > For 2.6, instead of building it as an outside package, > perhaps it should be an i386 subarch or flavour within the linux-2.6 > package?
Yes.
> it could just as
> easily be another i386 flavour (I believe the current linux-2.6 packaging
> supports the cross-compilation stuff necessary to override ARCH=um?).
Only if kernel-package sees this as a i386 subarch. But it is an easy
fix.
> According to the sf uml page, past 2.6.9, a separate patch is not needed
> for uml. What about the skas patch, was a version of that ever merged
> into 2.6?
SKAS is for the host and was never merged.
Bastian
--
I'm a soldier, not a diplomat. I can only tell the truth.
-- Kirk, "Errand of Mercy", stardate 3198.9
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
