On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 04:59:54PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 11:59:41PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > (...) but I don't see any reason to override britney's judgement regarding > > the out-of-date hppa packages. > > Please get an ftp-master to rene the old binaries, and then linux-2.6 > > can go into testing. > > Done, fwiw.
Over cool. > On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 09:35:39AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > No i don't understan you at all. You are saying that those renamed kernel > > packages are only in sid, and not in etch, so how could they have an > > influence > > on the transition of those packages to etch ? But i guess i simply > > misunderstood you about this. > > http://www.debian.org/devel/testing : > > 2. It must be compiled and up to date on all architectures it has previously > been compiled for in unstable; Mmm, so not only adding new binary packages, but removing them also needs manual processing ? Is at least this removal not something that could be automated ? Just curious about this one. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
