Your message dated Fri, 16 Sep 2005 21:28:48 -0700 (PDT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Not really a bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Sep 2005 18:35:22 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 13 11:35:22 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gold.veritas.com [143.127.12.110] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EFFco-0006H6-00; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 11:35:22 -0700
Received: from sxchcon2-int.veritas.com (HELO 
SVLXCHCON2.enterprise.veritas.com) (10.137.18.172)
  by gold.veritas.com with ESMTP; 13 Sep 2005 11:34:51 -0700
Received: from megami.veritas.com ([10.137.16.7]) by 
SVLXCHCON2.enterprise.veritas.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211);
         Tue, 13 Sep 2005 11:34:51 -0700
Received: from jtatum-desk.nsmg.veritas.com([10.67.51.17]) (1792 bytes) by 
megami.veritas.com
        via sendmail with P:esmtp/R:smart_host/T:smtp
        (sender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) 
        id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 11:34:50 -0700 (PDT)
        (Smail-3.2.0.101 1997-Dec-17 #15 built 2001-Aug-30)
Received: from jt by jtatum-desk.nsmg.veritas.com with local (Exim 4.52)
        id 1EFFcI-0001f0-Js; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 14:34:50 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jamie Tatum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: linux-image-2.6.12-1-686-smp: Kernel built with gcc 4.0.2,
 newest available gcc-4.0 is 4.0.1
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 14:34:50 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Sep 2005 18:34:51.0436 (UTC) 
FILETIME=[D3DFDEC0:01C5B891]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-686-smp
Version: 2.6.12-6
Severity: normal

I am having problems building kernel modules for 2.6.12-1, particularly
VMWare.  vmware-config reports that the kernel was built with gcc 4.0.2
and the installed version is 4.0.1.  If you continue building modules
anyway despite the warning, the resultant modules cause oops errors.

It doesn't look like 4.0.2 exists in unstable either or I would pull it
down.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-686-smp
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.12-1-686-smp depends on:
ii  coreutils [fileutils]         5.2.1-2    The GNU core utilities
ii  initrd-tools                  0.1.82     tools to create initrd image for p
ii  module-init-tools             3.2-pre8-1 tools for managing Linux kernel mo

linux-image-2.6.12-1-686-smp recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 328132-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Sep 2005 04:28:36 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 16 21:28:36 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mouth.voxel.net (mail.squishy.cc) [69.9.180.118] (postfix)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EGUJY-0007Kn-00; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 21:28:36 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
        by mail.squishy.cc (Postfix) with ESMTP id 371F24C301A1
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 00:28:35 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 21:28:48 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jurij Smakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Not really a bug
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Hi,

As I understand, this is not really a bug, but rather a feature of Debian 
gcc packaging. As Sven pointed out, previously gcc --version in sid said

gcc (GCC) 4.0.2 20050821 (prerelease) (Debian 4.0.1-6)

Now it has been already updated to

gcc (GCC) 4.0.2 20050913 (prerelease) (Debian 4.0.1-7)

As there seems to be no bug, I'm closing this report. Feel free to reopen 
with additional information if appropriate.

Best regards,

Jurij Smakov                                        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/                   KeyID: C99E03CC


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to