<some drop in excuse for the late reply, sorry..> On Mon, 12 Sep 2005, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 02:25:12PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > > On Mon, 12 Sep 2005, Bastian Blank wrote: > > > Why do we need klibc for initramfs? > > small size. > > LVM and multipath-tools are not built against klibc and the first don't > support it. indeed glibc is also needed md, lvm, evms and sed (dependency of mdrun). > > nice tools for initial userspace. > > libc or tools? busybox is also small. indeed we need busybox, there is no option unlike initrd-tools not to use it! what happened to the patch producing the small busybox deb that iniramfs-tools needs? did you accept the patch from jeff bailey? -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
