Hi Ben, In that case you have to find a way to provide signed and unsigned images simultaneously.
Otherwise to me it looks like a release blocker and I'll raise a ticket about this. 2017-01-17 18:55 GMT+01:00 Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]>: > Hello Ben, > > >No, there will be no such meta-packages. The -unsigned packages are > >only meant for developer testing and as build dependencies for signed > >binary packages. > > then, would you please kindly explain how you plan to address the > issue of not getting the security updates from newer kernel packages > installed on Debian systems for a week or so? > > > On Tue, 17 Jan 2017, Julien Aubin wrote: > > > Could you raise a ticket about this instead of the -unsigned metapackage? > > (Actually a -signed metapackage would make much more sense) > > That’s precisely what I already did, which you might have noticed. > And yes, that would make much more sense, because 90% or more of > Debian users have absolutely zero need, nor any surplus value a̲t̲ > a̲l̲l̲, from the signed images. > > > Thanks, > //mirabilos > -- > tarent solutions GmbH > Rochusstraße 2-4, D-53123 Bonn • http://www.tarent.de/ > Tel: +49 228 54881-393 • Fax: +49 228 54881-235 > HRB 5168 (AG Bonn) • USt-ID (VAT): DE122264941 > Geschäftsführer: Dr. Stefan Barth, Kai Ebenrett, Boris Esser, Alexander > Steeg >
