-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Control: tag -1 -wontfix
Control: reassign -1 linux

On Sun, 2017-01-29 at 09:10 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > I'm adding debian-kernel to this reply, in case the policy has changed.
> 
> It has never been as strict as you suggest, backports from mainline are
> ok too (and always have been AFAIK) if justified. For especially urgent
> or important fixes then "in a maintainers tree and so well on the way
> to mainline" can be the minimum necessary bar.
> 

Well. That is good then.

> > If this fix gets included in the Linux 4.9 LTS tree upstream, then Debian
> > would
> > automatically pull it for Stretch inclusion.
> 
> This is true too, but there's no particular need to wait for that
> process to unfold.
> 
> > But, at this moment, this isn't even in Linus's tree.
> 
> Can you point to the commit in the relevant upstream kernel maintainer's tree?

This should be the one:
http://git.infradead.org/users/dvhart/linux-platform-drivers-x86.git/commit/25a7c6f172af2a3187147c0ad4880c0968de3f02


- -- 
Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs
Debian - The Universal Operating System
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEQCVDstmIVAB/Yn02pjpYo/LhdWkFAliNtYEACgkQpjpYo/Lh
dWnH5w//VpCKHZMpjgeBq4WMgdjKcgHwZnJmz01tNxnjpddTcOqZf7HlHgS8a6Zo
2JZNAuzYlrxJD9yrIP7+Lk9hWuAXtOHfmFLhV9h2A3dmG43D0asII2dyVrukQrKZ
Sm1JbkfyCnxK5H8nNgV+u25uEfU6cpFRScv2kdIAHKAdHhp3oNh2iqAJcvPlTZ6s
DlgizhT02kgyT6fobVR02Jc8HNxMEV9LBS50Xt0exhXQ25Qtx1TJShqwM1vtKZn7
Qd11duDZSUH98Qw500n3RNXJdyPNGFN3xqJeKxVw4mhiZtUqD66kB+wlMu25vmSE
9YVJ3BinxGdetWH1cJrANxGLxksmic3UzbSRGbQ0fPjfJao5rQMxlQVK5A7w1jdJ
jVSKV2Xtt4Trck5XKNPXtVMTEO+F4tgER8GXoxQ4kziMvyAhQGKQ+nobraKCnGWy
zVJ5+PlDtEe8vT/XkFxqyc/H1H8svD4AQLm9bvzuLDYigPWCS0H1Lm++hv0B2Ubg
9bjiMCKCWlgpCI/USaY71omWjAnz6Lr/g3ZoQqw9FEvOmmmmZk4ijzjbTaY75Aku
H8kJIHPz+JRXi35EthOXlMR6xRJlhRxCIYjj0C235Szdz5UgkFQMxauso8KzPQgq
5isLdzTrUklFC0/Tuub+Kbac7sHAfaNNBAKgH1nZlBAoeP6cMRE=
=7w0f
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to