On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 06:52:23AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote: > On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 01:23:30AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote: > [...] > > > > Preferences? Once we have a common language, we can have a common > > library as well (ages ago, I wrote half a Kconfig parser in racc; that > > seems like it'd be useful for all kinds of scripts, but I'm not going to > > spend any more time on it until we decide whether I should continue in > > racc, or use something python-y). > > > > > > > I'm rather disappointed by the lack of responses to this. I don't intend > to do any more infrastructure work on the kernel packages until we pick > something; I don't particularly feel like having the things I write > rewritten multiple times, nor do I want to bother rewriting other people's > stuff.
The one doing the work is the one going to pick the language :) I am fine with whatever gets used, but i will probably not contribute any fixes if it is in some random strange and unobvious language. Since the choice seems to be python, ruby or perl, and i am not fluent in either of those, i doubt my opinion counts very much. (and BTW, i did vote for ocaml on irc, but then i guess that means nobody but me would understand it, so i understand that it is best not to chose that one). Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
