Your message dated Thu, 22 Sep 2005 23:07:04 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#329671: kernel-image-2.6-amd64-k8-smp: Kernel image in the 
intel x86 port is appears to be compiled in 64bit mode.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2005 15:52:27 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 22 08:52:27 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp.sanger.ac.uk [193.62.203.215] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EITN5-0004Wh-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 08:52:27 -0700
Received: from mascotsrv.internal.sanger.ac.uk ([172.17.60.2] ident=Debian-exim)
        by intmail1a.internal.sanger.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.41)
        id 1EITMZ-0006M8-Ke
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:51:55 +0100
Received: from gmpc by mascotsrv.internal.sanger.ac.uk with local (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EITM7-0001Yg-8h
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:51:27 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Guy Coates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: kernel-image-2.6-amd64-k8-smp: Kernel image in the intel x86 port is 
appears
 to be compiled in 64bit mode.
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:51:27 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: kernel-image-2.6-amd64-k8-smp
Version: 103
Severity: important


I've installed Sarge x86 on a opteron system. When changing the
kernel from 

kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686-smp 
to
kernel-image-2.6-amd64-k8-smp 

the machine architecture as reported by uname changes:

When running  kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686-smp

uname -m 
i686

On kernel-image-2.6-amd64-k8-smp
uname -m 
x86_64


Concequently, many applications fail to build correctly
from source (eg the linux kernel, probably anything using
config.guess) as the architecture is incorrectly specified.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.2
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages kernel-image-2.6-amd64-k8-smp depends on:
ii  kernel-image-2.6.8-11-amd64-k 2.6.8-14   Linux kernel image for version 2.6

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 329671-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2005 21:07:07 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 22 14:07:07 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from wavehammer.waldi.eu.org [82.139.196.55] (postfix)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EIYHb-0002kv-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 14:07:07 -0700
Received: by wavehammer.waldi.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id A2C413C017; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 23:07:04 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 23:07:04 +0200
From: Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Guy Coates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#329671: kernel-image-2.6-amd64-k8-smp: Kernel image in the 
intel x86 port is appears to be compiled in 64bit mode.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 04:51:27PM +0100, Guy Coates wrote:
> the machine architecture as reported by uname changes:

The uname shows the architecture of the kernel, not the userspace, so
this is the excepted behaviour by changing from a 32bit to a 64bit
kernel.

Bastian

--=20
Is truth not truth for all?
                -- Natira, "For the World is Hollow and I have Touched
                   the Sky", stardate 5476.4.

--ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkMzHPgACgkQnw66O/MvCNFMZACgoWC/t3TiY3iUTZvt7uegSGS0
6+8An3bbHXLUa+WuL1cG6+RZTNUUSiIb
=sPv0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to