On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > non-SMP kernels may be useful for a number of specialized uses. Think > > about kexec, test situations, low memory situations and running a > > kernel in a virtualized environment. > > Should Debian be burdened with supplying kernels for these situations? > Or should Debian provide kernels that perform acceptably well for 99% of > their users?
Well, upstream needs to make kernels configured for UP work and Debian should package them. The default kernel would need to be NUMA / SMP capable. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
