On Wed, 2018-02-07 at 13:50 -0500, Mike Maloney wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 12:23 PM, Yves-Alexis Perez <cor...@debian.org>
> 
> Hi Yves-Alexis -
> 
> I apologize for the problem.  It seems to me that tunneling with an
> outer MTU that causes the inner MTU to be smaller than the min, is
> potentially problematic in other ways as well.

Maybe. I tried with removing the MTU setting, and I get (on ping again)

févr. 07 20:44:01 scapa kernel: mtu: 1266

which means I would get -EINVAL on standards kernels, which is not really good
either.

> But also it could seem unfortunate that the code with my fix does not
> look at actual packet size, but instead only looks at the MTU and then
> fails, even if no packet was going to be so large.  The intention of
> my patch was to prevent a negative number while calculating the
> maxfraglen in  __ip6_append_data().  An alternative fix maybe to
> instead return an error only if the mtu is less than or equal to the
> fragheaderlen.   Something like:
> 
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c
> index 3763dc01e374..5d912a289b95 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c
> @@ -1214,8 +1214,6 @@ static int ip6_setup_cork(struct sock *sk,
> struct inet_cork_full *cork,
>                 if (np->frag_size)
>                         mtu = np->frag_size;
>         }
> -       if (mtu < IPV6_MIN_MTU)
> -               return -EINVAL;
>         cork->base.fragsize = mtu;
>         if (dst_allfrag(rt->dst.path))
>                 cork->base.flags |= IPCORK_ALLFRAG;
> @@ -1264,6 +1262,8 @@ static int __ip6_append_data(struct sock *sk,
> 
>         fragheaderlen = sizeof(struct ipv6hdr) + rt->rt6i_nfheader_len +
>                         (opt ? opt->opt_nflen : 0);
> +       if (mtu < fragheaderlen + 8)
> +               return -EINVAL;
>         maxfraglen = ((mtu - fragheaderlen) & ~7) + fragheaderlen -
>                      sizeof(struct frag_hdr);
>                         (opt ? opt->opt_nflen : 0);
> 
> But then we also have to convince ourselves that maxfraglen can never
> be <= 0.  I'd have to think about that.
> 
> I am not sure if others have thoughts on supporting MTUs configured
> below the min in the spec.
> 
Here, the MTU is not below, so I'm not sure what happens.

Regards,
-- 
Yves-Alexis

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to