On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 05:28:27PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Wed, 5 Oct 2005 09:24:17 +0200 > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > That was initramfs-tools, we should evaluate also yaird. > > Is anyone (besides you, sven) interested in yaird at all?
I suppose so, do you have an idea on what architectures it runs fine on, it would be especially interesting on those architectures where initramfs has trouble. > If not, why? I guess generic miscomprehension, or whatever. The fact that ubuntu uses initramfs-tools for example, and so on. I think what would be of most interest is a technical description of both solutions, as well as a list of arches where it is known to work, should work, almost works, fails utterly. The fact that yaird doesn't use klibc seems to be a nice feature on those arches where klibc is still broken. I believe the best solution is to leave the choice to the user, with a sane default depending on the arch/subarch used. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
