On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 04:22:32PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > On Friday 14 October 2005 07:38, Sven Luther wrote: > > I personally favour > > dropping the per arch copy of this files which needs individual > > modification, in favour of a simpler cpuinfo->flavour mapping and a > > single kernel-install file, but joeyh doesn't seem to like that. > > I'm sure that if you file a wishlist bug containing a patch with a > replacement which performs the same function as current scripts and > passes the current testsuites, we will be happy to review it and > implement it if it is truly simpler than the current scheme.
Yep, i know, and i probably will as time allows, i hoped to do that in Oldenburg, but as i wasn't able to free time to come ... Also, i think Joeyh had some technical reservations which where not without merit, so i guess there is no urgency, it just pains me to see all this syncing and hand interventions from a dozen porters needed to get the ball going for d-i. Right now solving the initrd/initramfs problem has more priority on my TODO list. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
