Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Hi Steiner,
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 09:42:38PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 08:10:18PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > We build in code because we have to, not because it's merely useful. > > And here we're talking about modules that are useful for only a small > > proportion of armhf systems. > > Well, if you count number of device trees, it's about 110 devices out of > 741 (having heartbeat or default-on as policy). So it's a minority (at least > if you don't try to weight by number of sold devices, which would be much > harder), but not complete obscurity. > > Anyways, I'm not going to try to drive this; my ARM bug reports are already > being met with deafening silence on the Exynos list, so there's enough > frustration involved :-) It's far from the most important thing in the big > picture. Despite the above involved frustration, do you know if someone else did report the problem and/or you know the issue is not present anymore with a recent kernel (from unstable ideally or mainline)? Regards, Salvatore
